THE CINDERELLA OF
WEST TEXAS: THE DISAPPEARANCE OF ANDREA LOPEZ PHARES
Late in the night of May 4, 1955, near Hale Center in the
West Texas panhandle, a 21 year old pregnant wife encountered, close to her
home, the man who would end her life and the life of her unborn child.
The young “Latin-American” woman,
newspapers agreed, was “pretty”, “had a nice shape”, was “fair complexed”, with lovely
long black hair. She also wore cat-eye eyeglasses, loved driving her husband’s
new Lincoln Continental, and her husband “allowed” her to carry large sums of
cash around because it made her happy. The woman dubbed by newspapers as leading a "Cinderella" life apparently found her life taking a sharp turn that fateful day.
On that fateful day her husband, a 44 year old prosperous cotton
grower on leased land west and north of Hale Center, said they were at home,
alone, at around 7 p.m. and she received a call, spoke Spanish to the caller,
and then said she was going into town. Her husband told reporters that she
asked, “I suppose you don’t want to go with me?” to which he said he responded
with a sleepy, “Don’t think so.” She then left about 8 p.m. driving away in the
Lincoln with her eyeglasses left behind at the house.
The next few hours are a mystery. The young wife and
soon-to-be mother, Andrea Lopez Phares, was never seen again.
Andrea Lopez was born about 1935 in Matamoros and had at
least two brothers, Andy and Gene Lopez. Before coming to Hale Center was said
to have lived in Weslaco, Texas. When she met C.W. “Bill” Phares she was
working as a cotton weigher for his
operation.
C.W. “Charles William” (known as “Bill”) Phares was born in
1912 in Ada, Oklahoma to Thomas and Nettie Phares. He served in the Army in WW2
from Oklahoma and married there. He is listed on the 1940 census in Brown
Township, Seminole county, Oklahoma with his wife Helen, two children (eldest
born in New Mexico) and a brother-in-law.
Newspapers indicated he had arrived in about 1945-51 in Texas living in
the area of southeast Hale County. This
seems proven because records indicate a daughter born there in March of
1951. Newspaper accounts provided
sketchy and oft times conflicting details of the Phares family prior to 1955. At that time small pieces of information came
forward indicating he had a brother named Jack, a sister named Iva Bottoms, and
a relative named Bill Ellis. His arrest in January of 1956 in Pontotoc county,
Oklahoma indicated his family association with that region and that his father
was named Thomas.
Charles William Phares’s image appears at least twice in newspaper
accounts related to the disappearance of his young wife; hers was found only
one time. In those images he appears very different. In one, taken shortly
after the disappearance he is pointing to the portion of missing mat in the
auto’s trunk, caption to the image revealed he was offering a $1000 reward for
information about his missing wife. He is a burly man with glasses, a straw
western style hat that had been pushed back off his dark hair enough to reveal
a slightly receding hairline and looks a man entering his middle years.
Andrea and C.W. Phares became involved, it is believed,
before he finalized his divorce from his first wife, Helen Keller Welch Phares. Andrea and “Bill”, newspapers reported, married
in Mexico when she was 19. Then in September of 1954, he married her again in a
Baptist Church in either Hale Center or in Clovis, New Mexico (accounts seem to
differ).
Hale Center, Hale County, Texas in the 1950’s was classic
west Texas thirty some miles north of Lubbock. It was largely flat interrupted
by small indentations and officially classed as a semi-arid landscape occupied
by hardy souls numbering less than 2,000. To the north and west was a section of the
Muleshoe Sandhills that stretched in to the next county and further west. The
town was severely destroyed in the middle of the sixties by a tornado but
valiantly rose from the ashes. Today, this “Oasis of the Plains”, has grown and
changed some but retains its feel of small town life and history.
 |
| Cotton Fields of Hale County, TX. Public Domain Image |
May 4, 1955
What is known about that night is subject to which story is
believed. There is the story that
emerged post May 4, 1955 and the story that emerged post the January 30, 1956
newspaper accounts of Phares’ arrest for murder.
According to various accounts offered via newspapers, C.W.
“Bill “ Phares selected to stay at home, alone,
when his wife said she was going into town around 8 p.m. He claimed she
received a phone call, spoke briefly in Spanish and then told him she had an
errand. Phares had claimed that two
weeks before the disappearance masked gunman had held him demanding $2000. On
that night he stayed home while his seven month pregnant wife drove into town
with $1400 in cash.
According to the husband, the car’s odometer showed it had
been driven some 150 miles. The abandoned vehicle, with the wife’s papers and
billfold still inside, was found on the east side of town the next day
(opposite the side of town where the Phares farm was located). The ignition
wires had been ripped out. Also missing,
was a cut or ripped out section of the trunk floor mat and a heavy blanket kept
there.
Despite widespread searching, the family that included her
two brothers Andy and Gene Lopez and brother-in-law Jack Phares and
sister-in-law- a Mrs. Iva Bottoms, no sign of the woman’s body was ever found.
In July it was noted the Phares farm had been sold and
Phares had gone to family back in Oklahoma seeking work in the oil fields
there. He inferred the tragedy had ruined him financially and emotionally.
Later newspapers indicate he arrived in Oklahoma in December so his exact
whereabouts are debatable.
The January 1956 Arrest
The carefully structured story first issued after the
woman’s disappearance had begun to show signs of internal collapse by year’s
end. In November of 1955, road crews had
found a .357 magnum pistol buried near the road to Abernathy (between Hale
Center and Lubbuck). The gun was traced to one sold by a New Mexico gun dealer
(either in Hobbs or Clovis, accounts vary). Phares claimed it had disappeared a
month after the May 1955 disappearance.
Early the next year (January and February 1956), police are
arresting Phares in Oklahoma and returning him to Texas where he is charged
with the death of his 21 year old and seven-month pregnant wife. His brother,
Jack Phares, is charged with perjury for claiming he had not been at the farm
but at the cinema.
Quickly, another version of the night’s events are laid out
across newspapers. On the day and evening of May 4, 1955 Andrea and C.W. had
been at home along with brother Jack, sister Iva Phares Bottoms, and other kin.
Mrs. Iva Phares Bottoms substantiated that a quarrel broke out between the
young couple and Andrea left early twilight in the Lincoln. Jack claimed C.W.
got in his own old model Chevy and followed her shortly after sun-down.
C.W., it was alleged, did not return until 11 p.m. claiming
he had not found Andrea and enlisting the help of his family members: Mr. and
Mrs. Bill Ellis, Iva Bottoms, and Jack. They spent the next several hours
searching Plainview, Olton unsuccessfully.
At 4 a.m. C.W. reported his wife missing to local police and shortly
after dawn the Lincoln was found east of Hale Center with ignition wired
ripped, billfold inside, and items missing from the trunk.
Significantly, Texas Rangers Gene Graves, W.E. Renfrow, and
Raymond Waters, along with Hale County Sheriff Tom Anderson, all seemed
convinced the woman was dead and that she had probably been shot by her
husband. They did keep the cause open admitting strangulation or physical
violence was also a feasible cause. Once retrieved in Oklahoma, Phares was
driven around a wide area associated with the likely events of May 4, 1955:
Hale Center, Plainview, Olton, Abernathy and the Sandhills of northwest Hale and
northeast Lamb counties. Volunteers were on site in this last location but
winds curtailed effective searching for signs of a recent grave. Recent information (9/11/19) from the Texas Department of Public Service under which the Texas Rangers operate, states they have no records of rangers being involved in the 'murder investigation' of Andrea Phares.
Quickly acquired lawyers from nearby Lubbock moved to bring
both men before Judge E.A. Bells (64th District
Court) under a writ of habeas corpus (a legal move that forces authorities to
bring forward the evidence causing a person to be held). The law did that,
presenting the retrieved pistol and the buried watch and rings as evidence,
along with the testimony of family. The Judge refused to release the men but
did lower their bonds. The case moved forward to a grand jury.
Later February 1956 a posse from Hockley, joined one from
Lamb County and the Petersburg Riding Club joined a group of Latin Americans
with shovels who were seeking likely spots a body might have been buried.
Although C.W. “Bill” Phares received most of the newspaper
space, the Lopez family suffered during this same time. Various fortunetellers,
psychics, dousers, and con artists preyed on the family in the traumatic months
after Andrea disappeared. They reported how such attempted to bilk the family
out of funds to locate their missing relative, her grave, or to receive
messages from the grave. A year after
her disappearance her brothers Andy and Gene were prominent among those
searching with tractors and backhoes the now abandoned Phares Cotton Farm and
locations in the region where a body might have been buried.
When the Judge lowered the Phares brother’s bonds there may
have been several things influencing that decision. What may have influenced
the Judge was the troublesome discovery that Bill Phares had buried his wife’s
wrist watch and engagement and wedding rings in a culvert near a bridge not far
from the cotton farm. Phares’ explanation was that he had found them in the
jacket he had worn that early May and was afraid police would think he had
something to do with his wife’s disappearance. So, instead, he wrapped them up
and buried them. They were located by Texas Ranger W.E. Renfro of Lubbock. Renfrew
would later comment that this case was one he always wished they had been able
to settle before he retired.
An additional factor in the decision may have been the
discarded gun. A few months after the disappearance a road crew turned up a
.357 magnum pistol in a ditch 3 miles north of Abernathy, TX (a short 16 miles
south from Hale Center and on the way to where Phares said he was born in
Lorenzo, Texas, circa 1911). The pistol was traced back to Phares as one sold
to him Feb. 24, 1955 by a Clovis, NM dealer.
Grand Jury Fails to Indict Husband
Despite these rather significant issues, a grand jury
convened failed to indict and the men went free. Coupled with the apparently
unaddressed claims that Jack Phares had lied about being at the home that night
and that he had heard his brother confess to having murdered his wife and
buried her in the sand hills nearby, the decision of the grand jury is thought
provoking. Phares was reported to have
moved, by 1959, to Arizona. A recent search of death notices found Phares had died in Oklahoma. His grave memorial indicates he was C.W. “Bill” Phares (Charles William Phares) born 1912, in Ada,
Pontotoc, Ok and that he died and was buried in the same county in 1988.
Every few decades, the haunting story of the young mother-to-be
was revisited, recapped, and yet always concluded the same chilling way. No
one, anywhere, had ever seen the young wife after that fateful day in May of
1955. There was one suspicious rumor
that showed up from the Oklahoma panhandle but it was questionable on many
levels and was not picked up or repeated with any belief.
Soon, it will be 65 years since that event, and the mention
of Andrea Lopez Phares, appears to have been removed from the missing networks
checked online. Originally found prior to 2014 she was not listed as the time of the writing of this essay. She is not listed under cases solved or closed. Requests to agencies have gone unanswered. In 1969,
newspapers recapped the story of this Latin-American Cinderella tale that took
a dark turn and quoted a member of the law who admitted the case had slipped to
the back burner and no one had looked at it for awhile. Sometimes a case can grow too cold and the hoary frost of neglect builds.
As early as late May 1955, local police and law enforcement
were pretty convinced the young woman was dead. Newspapers did not recount any
other suspects beyond the husband and police never admitted such. So many
unanswered questions remain.
1.
What are the details of the alleged kidnapping
attempt of C.W. “Bill” Phares, two weeks before the disappearance?
2.
Why did he have the habit of carrying large
amounts of cash around with him and why did he ‘allow’ his wife to do so at the
time of her disappearance? Especially in light of the attempted ransom demand
claimed by Phares.
3.
Why does her pregnancy play such a small role in
discussions of her disappearance? Few
newspapers included the fact she was pregnant or that she was seven months
along. Early conjecture in newspaper
columns and comments appeared to be that she must have run off with another man
but at seven months pregnant that story seems awkward. Such missing persons
cases in the 1940’s-1960’s often enlarged the salacious possibilities even at
the cost of accuracy.
4.
When she left that last night she did not take
her glasses. What was her prescription for (reading farsightedness,
nearsightedness, did she need them to drive? Especially at 8 p.m.?) The only photograph found of her in a
newspaper (another oddity) shows her nicely dressed and wearing eyeglasses. Why
did she not take them that last night?
5.
What about the missing rings and watch? Why did
her husband think it made sense to bury them? He had no need to hide them or to
try explain how they came to be in his coat.
6.
Why did his brother Jack Phares claim that C.W.
“Bill” Phares had confessed to him of the killing and subsequent burial? What
happened to the flip-flop claims about where he was the night of the
disappearance?
7.
Why was the car’s wiring ruined? Why was the
trunk mat ripped leaving a gap and the blanket taken? How did the car
thief/murderer get away from the scene of the abandoned car? A logical
rationale would be that someone wanted the car to remain exactly where it was
found. A much loved car simply abandoned might have been too tempting to a
passerby. Did someone want to make sure he would get the car back? The ripped
out section of mat might have been blood stained due to injury to either the
wife or the fetus. The blanket would make a handy carryall for an injured or
dead body. A dead body might have bleed or released bodily fluids necessitating the removal of the incriminating rug. One wonders, if and when, her remains are located will they be
associated with a ripped out section of car mat and a heavy blanket?
8.
If the husband’s claim that the night added some
150 miles is true that might mean that someone could have driven anywhere in a
70-75 mile radius of the Hale Center farm house to dispose of her body. It is
interesting to note that a .357 magnum pistol tracked to Phares had been dumped
near Abernathy, Texas. How many miles
might have been added in the process of dumping a body, burying a handgun, and
jewelry before driving to the other side of Hale Center – as far away from the
cotton farm – as possible?
Finally, one of the most troublesome questions in this mystery. Why were the wires of the Lincoln ripped out in the first place? Why was not this car stolen and simply driven away? Did someone want to make certain the car did not leave the area?
The Theories
Three possible scenarios might account for disappearance and
have been expressed by researchers over the years:
The flighty young Latin-American woman grew bored with the
hard life on the cotton farm and left with a lover or family members. As a young girl born into poverty who
married the boss winning the right to drive a fancy car and live in a neat
stucco and wood farm house carrying lots of cash in her wallet, this
explanation seems thin.
Someone kidnapped her. Her husband claimed he had been taken
by masked gunman demanding money just two weeks earlier. This also seems
farfetched for two reasons. If this had been the case, why was no ransom
demanded and why did Phares allow his pregnant wife to carry large sums of cash
and drive unaccompanied?
Looking over the stories as they appear in newspapers across
several states some things appear to stand out and point toward a single
conclusion.
Is it possible that trouble broke out at the farm house that
late afternoon or nearby on the evening of May 4, 1955? Did this result in violence occurring
(perhaps involving the .357 magnum?), and the young woman being driven away
(perhaps in the trunk?) by someone in the Lincoln Continental while an
accomplice followed?
As police seemed certain at the time, was she driven to a
place where her body could be easily disposed of (in the sand hills as claimed
by Jack Phares?). Who took off her watch and rings? Were a blood soaked
car mat and a blanket buried with her?
On the drive back, was the gun buried, the car abandoned with wires
ripped out to insure no loss of the beloved auto, and did someone pocket the
$1400 alleged to be on her person, and did
someone then bury her jewelry and watch.
Andrea's Disappearance Turns 65 in 2020
As this case prepares to turn 65, the woman in question would
be about 81 in 2020 and the child, if it was alive, might be turning retirement
age. A cold case for some, a haunting
loss for others, and a reminder that for those lost we should never stop
looking. As of September 2019, The Doe Network reports they never received a listing for this missing person. The Charley Project does not show her listed and neither do various Texas missing person sites. If someone did her and her unborn child harm, the books should never
close until justice can write ‘finished’ at the end of the story.
After all, in the end, there is no statue of limitations on the truth.
--Marilyn A. Hudson (based on research originally conducted in 2014-2015, printed in the work 'Into Oblivion' (now out of print) and augmented by additional research in 2019. All data from public documents, records, and statements related to the investigation).
