The girl in a red
plastic belt
The horrific murder of Betty Jack Stevens
Canadian County,
Oklahoma, July 29, 1952
Late July 1952 in northern Texas and Oklahoma was fairly normal. The mid
to high nineties It was the kind of weather locals called
‘leaving the door to hell open.’
Electric fans sold well and water cooler air systems were kept damp and
freshening by barefoot children eager for any excuse to get wet in the soaring
heat and humidity. In August of 1953 the victim was identified and efforts to discover her murderer were turning out to be more challenging than first supposed.
In the news was a story a of surprise strike of Packinghouse Workers at the
Oklahoma City Stockyards on July 22. Other
news included the high temperatures, news of Egypt’s King Forouk ousted, the
Air Force assurances that the strange “UFO blips seen over Washington D.C. were
nothing but “cold air”, and a Houston chlorine gas plant leak that sent over
three hundred to treatment; all in all it looked like the month would end much
on a pretty average note.
On Tuesday, July 28, 21 year old Betty Jack Stevens was hitchhiking. She was the daughter of O.S. Stevens and had
been born in Waxahachie before her family moved to the Dallas area. Her mother
had died several years before but her aging father still lived in Grapevine and
several siblings were in north Texas.
She had left home at age 16 for a short, and soon annulled, marriage.
Ever since then she had been working the odd waitressing job and moving around
in Texas, Oklahoma, New Mexico and Arizona.
She had a police record in a few locations in Texas but mostly for
vagrancy and a couple for public intoxication.
Her exact timetable on that Tuesday is hazy in spots. Witnesses placed
her leaving a West Dallas motor court early morning. Later, around
mid-afternoon, she would tell people in
she had been to Odessa. What is
known is that she arrived in Henrietta, Texas over the weekend. That was where
she purchased some new clothes. She discarded, perhaps because of the heat, a
dark skirt and blouse. She replaced them
with a new blue sweater, blue jeans, lavender shoes and a red plastic belt. The
colors went well with her dark eyes and dark hair with red highlights worn in a
shoulder length cut, and her brown eyes.
Her eyes were one of her best features; piercing and direct with a no
nonsense bravery.
Hitchhiking she arrived in the small town of Alvord where she stopped at
the local Café. Alvord was a small community on US 81 and located northwest of
the Dallas area. The male owner spoke with her and she told him
she needed to get back to a job. Around
5 p.m. she finished a meal, as she had done so many times before, headed out the door to find a ride. No one ever saw her alive after that.
On Wednesday July 30, 1952 the forecast in the center of Oklahoma was more
hot and sweltering. The Stockyards
section of the metropolitan area was still struggling with the effects of a
strike of union workers at the Oklahoma City Armour plant. Competition from non-union
Wilson Meats Company was creating some tension. With many workers off or on the
picket line the yards were busy but sales were “lame.”
J.P. Brooks, of Yukon, was traveling along a minor county road (Richland
Road) that Wednesday not far from the old West Point School (near SW 15th). Along that stretch was a small bridge over
the usually dry and sandy bedded Shell Creek. As he drove down the road that
day, something in the ravine caught his eye.
A nude human torso was there in the ravine on a slight incline of the
bank. Oddly enough, it could be seen from the road if the driver came from the
south but was not visible to vehicles coming from the north. The nearest
telephone was down the road at the farm of Lee Florence and Brooks hurried there
to report his find to the County Sheriff.
At this time the community of Yukon did not even have a police
force. All law enforcement came through
the Canadian County Sheriff or state police in the form of the State Crime
Bureau (a predecessor of the Oklahoma Bureau of Investigation). Tiny Royse, the county sheriff, had never
encountered any crime scene like that which awaited in the dry creek bed. Local doctors seemed thrown off their game as
well. Early examination of the mutilated
female body described it as belonging to a young teenager of perhaps 13-16
years.
If they were off their game, they had good cause. The woman’s body was nude, headless,
handless, and someone had attempted to cut off at least one of her feet. There were obvious marks of beating and
torture on various parts of her body and incised in the flesh of the abdomen
were the letters “R-A-T”.
Soon the small road was clogged with District Attorney’s, law officers,
news hounds and the curious. One early photo clearly shows a hodge-podge of
onlookers, searchers, and others wandering up and down the area where the body
had been left.
Despite all this traffic, they did find evidence the torso had been dragged across the dirt road and thrown down into the ravine. It was apparent that the person had then climbed over into the creek bed and pulled the body up further into the ravine. This might indicate some posing of the remains especially since it visible from one direction and not the other.
Did the killer want his work found? Uncertain but after that, with hands or perhaps a branch, the killer had rubbed away his foot prints. It is strange that although found along roadsides, neither portion of her body and belongings were in easy-to-see areas at the time of their finding. This causes some questions to surface about the way the body was discovered that remain unanswered to this day. Knowing how killers often like to make sure police locate the evidence of their handiwork that avenue should have been more closely explored.
Despite all this traffic, they did find evidence the torso had been dragged across the dirt road and thrown down into the ravine. It was apparent that the person had then climbed over into the creek bed and pulled the body up further into the ravine. This might indicate some posing of the remains especially since it visible from one direction and not the other.
Did the killer want his work found? Uncertain but after that, with hands or perhaps a branch, the killer had rubbed away his foot prints. It is strange that although found along roadsides, neither portion of her body and belongings were in easy-to-see areas at the time of their finding. This causes some questions to surface about the way the body was discovered that remain unanswered to this day. Knowing how killers often like to make sure police locate the evidence of their handiwork that avenue should have been more closely explored.
The remains were taken to a local funeral home while attempts at
identification were made. Calls from
several states and from Oklahoma communities (Enid, Woodward, Oklahoma City and
Guyman) flooded local switchboards as worried parents, brothers and husbands
attempted to find missing daughters.
Apparently there was an appalling number of missing women in this time
period. One early wrinkle in the case
was the firm conviction and publication that the mutilated woman had been the 20
year old daughter of an Oklahoma City woman,
Mabel Pennington. The mother was desperately searching for her missing
daughter, Tillie Mae Pennington, who was also the mother of a two year old
child. The young woman had gone missing
the previous Friday (July 25) in the late afternoon. Yet another OKC mother was also concerned it
was her missing daughter, one Dorothy Moss, who had not been seen since
Monday, July 27.
Police were stumped and clearly not sure where to go with the case that
left everyone so horrified and fearful.
Repeatedly the stressed that it was unclear if the individual had even
been killed in Oklahoma. Unspoken was heard loudly seemed to be a prayer:
please not have been done here.
On Friday August 1, at about 11 a.m., a local Oklahoma City salesman,
Fuller R. Cummins, was traveling the
north-south run of U.S. 81. The road comes up out of Texas (and Alvord) through
Duncan into Union City and north to El Reno. About 4 miles south of Union City, south of
the South Canadian River Bridge, he saw something bobbing in a shallow pool of
stagnant river water. His immediate
thought was the headless victim found just days before.
Authorities found there the badly decomposed and battered head of a young
woman with shoulder length dark hair. Nearby were two female severed
hands. Searching along the brush and in
the water they found several items of women’s clothing; one a now faded blue
item.
Texas authorities, near Decauter, had meanwhile discovered a man’s dead
body. It had been dumped in Texas not far from U.S. 81 and so the Texas
investigators entered the picture wondering if the two deaths might be
related. Local law enforcement officials
in Oklahoma made hearty and hopeful statements to the press. They hoped, that
through the partnership of Texas authorities, there would surely be a swift end
to the sad situation.
With just a torso and no hands identification of the victim had ground to
a halt. She did not seem to match any
known Oklahoma missing person reports. Now,
after the discovery of the head and the hands the case gained new impetus.
Through fingerprints she was identified. At the start of the new week, the
story had now grown to include the fact the woman was an out of work waitress
from Dallas with a penchant for hitchhiking.
The victim of this appalling ‘butcher-murder’ was 21 year old Betty Jack
Stevens. The autopsy would only add to
the horror as it became clear she had been beaten savagely, hands bound, tortured, and
she was beheaded while still alive. Blood in her lungs indicated it had been a series of attempts to complete the beheading before she succumbed. The carved
letters may have been incised prior to death or just after.
In
the way of the times, the fact she was ‘known to police’ in Texas and
Dallas was titillating fodder. The degree of her trouble with police
ranged
from a claim that charges had been only minor vacancies and drunken
fines in
her home state of Texas made little inroads in the salaious tone in some
reports. Some newspapers made allegations (Oklahoma newspapers)
that she had also been a prostitute. Verification for her ever being a
prostitute were never
offered in print by any police or creditable news writers.
The letters carved into her abdomen, spelled “R-A-T”, and was seen as
significant by many police investigators.
Indeed, it may offer some of the most important clues. The term was one then popular among the underworld and criminal classes
for an informant. Searching into the
life of the victim it was found that just the year before she had witnessed the murder of
a man and had given testimony that put the murderer away in a
Texas facility. Despite the fact police were never
able to make any connections to the prisoner or the death of Stevens this is an interesting fact.
A ghost lingered, however, in the minds of many of the law enforcement
personnel. As they stood by the side of
the dry creek bed or searched among the stagnant water pools and walked the muddy banks of the river they knew
they were too close to another unsolved crime.
One that had many similarities to the one they now faced.
Just a dozen miles away was the small farm northeast of Tuttle where just
that previous March 13th the bones of another dismembered woman had been
found. Had Lois Depew been a victim of
this same butcher? There
were just too
many parallels. As they searched in that sweltering heat of the early
days of
August many felt certain that a local man was responsible. Not all
agreed and
just as many knew deep in their bones that it had to be some out of
state
maniacs or criminal types. [Update: The Depew case, according to
descendants, was solved closer to home with a deathbed confession of her
husband].
Some were firmly convinced that the woman must have been killed in
Texas. Then, instead of disposing of the
body anywhere between the state line and the many miles of lonely highway, the
murderer had driven deep into central Oklahoma.
Finally discarding their kill there along obscure lonely roads few but
locals would know existed.
The case was severely hampered in several important ways that would
negatively impact the course of the investigation. Convinced, as they were by the word of the
local doctor that the victim was far younger, they may have missed linking her
sooner with potential witnesses. The mother claiming her daughter was the
victim distracted the investigation. As a result law officers became fixated on
a local man who showed a lot of interest in the case. Out of left field, a
Lawton woman apparently tried to pin the killing on a man with which she had
some quarrel. She gained her five
minutes of fame by claiming she was friends with Betty Jack Stevens. She claimed to be an eye witness to torture
and Steven’s fearful confidences of fear about a menacing “Spanish looking
man.” Despite her written testimony,
Dallas police quickly found serious holes in her claims. Additionally, a man being held in the
Oklahoma City jail “confessed” but soon proved false and officers in both Texas
and Oklahoma busily searched for cars (largely non-existent) tracking down
reports of blood on benders or in back seats.
Worst of all was the assumption, one made so frequently in the time, that
such mutilation was solely the attempt of the killer to disguise the identity
of the victim. A simple and logical
assumption that would prove to be less than comprehensive in all cases. Repeat offenders who killed in the same manner
or location were called “chain killers.” The era of understanding the “sadist
killer” was just dawning.
There are logical fallacies in assuming the mutilation was an attempt to
send a message to ‘underworld informers’ about the dangers of ‘ratting
out’. The most obvious problem in the
assumption is the message depends on being found and understood. The body was
left in a low traffic area and dragged further back into a ravine.
Investigators noted it could only been seen traveling from one direction. Unless
the message was directed at someone a third party knew would be coming down
that road, at the right time, and understand its meaning, it was risky.
Then, there is the obvious fact that letters carved into flesh in late
July are not going to survive long as a readable message anyway. Decomposition and the work of natural
scavengers would see to that in a short time.
The assumption the head and hands were similarly removed to retard
identification is then made a mote point when they are discarded, and found,
together. Again, they are tossed off a
bridge into a shallow pool of water in an otherwise drought stricken waterway
along the most traveled highway of that area.
These points all tend to present a killer who wanted his work found and
knew enough about travel routes to know the chances of it being found were
high. An argument emerges for a local man or men or someone familiar with the area due to their job.
The case provided so little information and generated so many unanswered
questions.
Where, for example, was she killed? There was no blood on her or around her when her body was found. To kill, drain the blood, and dismember a human body would require some privacy, access to running water and drainage, and some degree of being recognized as it being normal for the killer(s) to be in that location so as to not raise alarm. This could be, as police suggested at the time, a house or farm. It might also include access to a slaughterhouse, a butcher shop, a veterinary clinic or office, or some similar location allowing the necessary privacy and tools.
Where, for example, was she killed? There was no blood on her or around her when her body was found. To kill, drain the blood, and dismember a human body would require some privacy, access to running water and drainage, and some degree of being recognized as it being normal for the killer(s) to be in that location so as to not raise alarm. This could be, as police suggested at the time, a house or farm. It might also include access to a slaughterhouse, a butcher shop, a veterinary clinic or office, or some similar location allowing the necessary privacy and tools.
Interestingly enough, the location of where her torso was found,
that Richland Road and SW 15th area may provide a significant clue.
Although SW 15th does not go straight through due to the North
Canadian River, the street is picked up again in south Oklahoma City, running
right past the old Packingtown District. This was an area where slaughterhouses and meat processing plants once thrived.
Along the journey of this dramatic story,
a lot about the young girl who changed into a cheerful blue outfit with
a bright red belt and fun lavender shoes became lost. As this victim of human inhumanity was
reduced to a collection of body parts her essential personhood was forgotten. As this object of fragments she is distanced
from her context as daughter, sister, and a girl too much like someone we know
for own peace of mind.
These crimes make us uncomfortable and so they should. They should make
us so uncomfortable we do not stop until they are solved and the person, or
persons, responsible is revealed.
Until then remember Betty Jack Stevens not as the “nude, headless torso”,
the “mutilated” victim of a “mad-butcher”, not the girl with a few run-ins with
police for not having a place to sleep or drinking a little too much, but on the life that should have been for the
girl with the red plastic belt.
--Marilyn A. Hudson c2015
Original
news article:
https://gateway.okhistory.org/ark:/67531/metadc920084/m1/1/zoom/?resolution=4&lat=5072&lon=2848